Opinions About California’s Proposition 31, A Statewide Flavoured Tobacco Ban

Flavour bans are a type of prohibition, which solely gasoline the expansion of large black markets and likewise result in elevated smoking charges, as many vapers would flip again to smoking. The laws was signed …

Flavour bans are a type of prohibition, which solely gasoline the expansion of large black markets and likewise result in elevated smoking charges, as many vapers would flip again to smoking.

The laws was signed into regulation in 2020 however stayed pending this veto referendum. The San Diego Union Tribune, has just lately shared two opposing opinions about this proposed ban.

Crotty-Alexander M.D., an affiliate professor of medication at UC San Diego and a member of the American Lung Affiliation, believes that the supply of vape flavours resembling cotton sweet, gummy bears and cookies and cream, are nothing however a intelligent ploy by Large Tobacco to get youngsters hooked on these new nicotine merchandise.

“Intentionally focusing on youngsters with candy-flavored tobacco merchandise has yielded Large Tobacco a bumper crop of younger clients, making a youth digital cigarette epidemic. It’s no shock that 96 p.c of highschool e-cigarette customers in California use flavored e-cigarettes,” he mentioned.

However, Tom Hudson President of the California Taxpayer Safety Committee in Rocklin, mentioned that the measure is pointless. “The politicians who wrote Proposition 31 say it can scale back underage tobacco use — but it surely’s already unlawful to promote any tobacco product to anybody below the age of 21 in California, with large penalties for breaking the regulation.”

“Prohibition has by no means labored”

Furthermore, he added, the measure is predicated on prohibition, a method that has by no means labored. “Prohibition has by no means labored. It didn’t work with alcohol or marijuana, and it received’t work now.”

In step with this argument, famend heart specialist and smoking cessation researcher Dr. Konstantinos Farsalinos, has just lately reiterated that vape flavours are essential at serving to people who smoke change to safer nicotine alternate options.

The researcher has just lately revealed, “The Case for Flavours in Tobacco Hurt Discount, to Save Lives”, a paper which discusses the hyperlink between flavoured nicotine merchandise and smoking cessation success intimately. The report highlights that finally flavour bans are a type of prohibition, which solely gasoline the expansion of large black markets and likewise result in elevated smoking charges, as many vapers would flip again to smoking.

Discussing the report in a latest episode on Regulator Watch, Farsalinos mentioned Well being Canada’s just lately proposed ban, saying that their case for such a ban could also be crumbling as proof retains indicating its doubtlessly detrimental affect on public well being.

US: San Diego Bans Vape and Tobacco Flavours

Leave a Comment