On June 1st, the Los Angeles Metropolis Council voted in favour of a ban on non-tobacco flavoured vaping merchandise, flavoured cigars and menthol cigarettes, at 12 to 1. The ban was pushed by the Michael Bloomberg-funded Marketing campaign for Tobacco-Free Youngsters (CTFK) and it now sits on Mayor Eric Garcetti’s desk, who’s anticipated to signal it.
“We simply took an enormous step ahead in opposition to Large Tobacco’s lethal agenda in Los Angeles.” mentioned Councilmember Mitch O’Farrell in a tweet. “We simply took an enormous step ahead in opposition to Large Tobacco’s lethal agenda in Los Angeles. This morning, I led the Metropolis Council’s unanimous approval of a prohibition on the sale of flavored tobacco to everybody 21 and youthful in LA, making us the most important metropolis in California and the nation to take this type of motion in opposition to these merchandise,” he added even if the ban applies to everybody, not simply these beneath 21.
Actual life knowledge doesn’t point out promising outcomes
Sadly, a examine revealed in JAMA Pediatrics, discovered that following San Francisco’s flavour ban, youngsters within the metropolis’s excessive faculties had been extra prone to take up smoking than youngsters in class districts with no such ban in place.
In August 2020, SB 793 by Senator Jerry Hill, banned the sale of flavoured tobacco merchandise, together with non-tobacco merchandise resembling e-cigarettes throughout town of San Francisco. The examine titled, “A Distinction-in-Variations Evaluation of Youth Smoking and a Ban on Gross sales of Flavored Tobacco Merchandise in San Francisco, California,” aimed to find out any relationship between San Francisco’s ban on flavoured tobacco product gross sales and smoking amongst highschool college students youthful than 18 years.
The town’s chief economist had predicted that the cash spent on vaping merchandise previous to the ban would nonetheless be spent on different nicotine merchandise resembling standard cigarettes. Consistent with skilled predictions earlier than the ban had even gone into impact, the researchers discovered that following the ban, youngsters within the metropolis’s excessive faculties had been extra prone to take up smoking than youngsters in US college districts the place no flavour bans had been imposed. Whereas previous to the ban, smoking charges in San Francisco had been just like these of many cities throughout the nation.
“To grasp this conceptually, take into consideration youth preferences between tobacco merchandise,” mentioned examine writer Abigail Friedman, an assistant professor within the Division of Well being Coverage and Administration on the Yale College of Public Well being, in a press release. “Amongst youths who vape, some doubtless desire ENDS to flamable merchandise due to the flavors.”
“For these people in addition to would-be vapers with related preferences, banning flavors might take away their main motivation for selecting vaping over smoking,” she continued. “Thus, a few of them will reply to a ban on flavors by selecting to make use of flamable merchandise as a substitute of ENDS.”
Earlier knowledge compiled from a comfort pattern of residents of San Francisco, California, aged 18 to 34 years who had ever used a tobacco product, had already proven a rise in flamable cigarette use (smoking) amongst these aged 18 to 24 years.
Learn Additional: Filter