In addition to being broadly criticized unreliable and biased work, lately Glantz was even accused of sexual harassment and racist abuse.
Titled, “Nicotine Dependancy and Depth of e-Cigarette Use by Adolescents within the US, 2014 to 2021, the research in query reported that between 2014 and 2017, lower than 1% of vapers reported utilizing their units inside 5 minutes of waking up, whereas by 2021, the determine had drastically elevated to 10.3%.
Apart from quoting this research, UAE physician Dr Harkirat S. Wilkhoo, well being and life-style Coach at RAK Hospital, mentioned that almost all teenagers vape on account of peer strain, a declare which has certainly been backed by science. Nevertheless he went on to make some inaccurate statements in regards to the danger ranges of the merchandise. “E- cigarettes are under no circumstances cool. It provides the pleasure of euphoria, however they’re very dangerous as they’ve heavy metals and carcinogenic chemical substances that are absorbed immediately into deep lung tissue,” Dr Harkirat mentioned.
Are this research dependable?
In the meantime again in 2020, lead creator of the research above Dr. Stanton Glantz, who’s infamous for his anti-vape bias and his flawed research, retired from the College of California-San Francisco (UCSF) with out warning and/or rationalization.
A tweet in regards to the shock resignation by Gregory Conley from the American Vape Affiliation, had identified that this transfer got here solely six months after his notorious paper linking vaping to coronary heart assaults was retracted. “Six months after a paper he wrote falsely linking vaping to coronary heart assaults was retracted by its publishing journal, it seems that Stanton Glantz has retired from UCSF,” he tweeted.
Flawed and biased research
The research in query was printed in June 2019, by the Journal of the American Coronary heart Affiliation. Following a variety of alerts by fellow lecturers, the journal identified that the research had did not specify what got here first, the vaping or the center assaults. When requested to supply additional information to find out the course of this relationship, Glantz and his staff failed to take action, resulting in the retraction of the research.
UCSF’s Middle for Tobacco Management Analysis and Schooling, from whence Glantz resigned, has lately acquired a complete of $40 million in grants, with a purpose to conduct research on the consequences of vaping.